![]() |
![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Using XATSHOW also as ARCHIVE
Hello Darwin >I hate to whine before the feature is even out Its ok, I'm used to it ;-) .... and of course its the best time to as It could be changed! >- but I have my files >named uniquely so that they can always be indentified no matter where >they are located (YYYY-MM-000). > >Why do they need to be renamed? Three reasons: We are limited to 8.3 filenames Renaming preserves the order of the images If an image is used twice or two images have the same name it avoids a clash. I am considering including say RENAME.BAT which would rename the pictures back to their original file name if copied onto disk first. >Will they retain all EXIF and ITPC data? (ie - a simple file system copy >will not remove this data - any type of jpg re-save might.) Yes, although currently time/date not preserved (this might change!) >Will full archive versions be supported in the PC Slide show as well? Hmmmm, I haven't included a .xats file yet, only the pictures, so I guess not yet. Chris. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Using XATSHOW also as ARCHIVE
Hello robin >Will that include animations? Only if they are pre converted to VCD MPEG1. You can use a freeware package like TMPGEnc http://www.tmpgenc.com/ to do this. MPEG1 support is rather basic at the moment but useful nevertheless ... >I have pictures that I added animations to >and saved as a jpg. I don't follow, jpegs can't be animations ... Chris. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Using XATSHOW also as ARCHIVE
Hello Michael >it would be good to >have an idea whether the total package can still be burned on one >CD. E.g. before creating the CD image file give an indication of how >much of total CD capacity will be used.... We have no graph yet, but we do warn if the size is going to be big so you can choose not to proceed if its too big to fit on a CD. (There is a bug that is fixed in the next release of this) The professional Edition allows you to include a file called FILES.ZIP that can of course include anything you want on the CD, efficiently packaged and with long filenames. Indeed Me and XP can browse zip files ... Chris. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Using XATSHOW also as ARCHIVE
My mistake. It was a gif. that I saved it in. Used Cool 3D to create it. robin |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Using XATSHOW also as ARCHIVE
Why not use a self-extracting ZIP file? Then the zip could be 8.3, the names inside could be long names. Also, there would be a significant amount of compression saving some disk space. There is a good free self-extractor maker called sfxmaker at http://sfxmaker.cjb.net/. Even if this option was only available if I had the right utilities installed (infozip is a freeware command line zipper, same with powerarchiver and WinZip has a command line addon for registered users) - it would be very useful. Maybe I type in the zip file and self-extractor maker command lines as part of configuration. D. _________________________________ Darwin Sanoy Principal Consultant / Instructor DesktopEngineer.com WindowsInstallerTraining.com Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 2:06 AM Hello Darwin >I hate to whine before the feature is even out Its ok, I'm used to it ;-) .... and of course its the best time to as It could be changed! >- but I have my files >named uniquely so that they can always be indentified no matter where >they are located (YYYY-MM-000). > >Why do they need to be renamed? Three reasons: We are limited to 8.3 filenames Renaming preserves the order of the images If an image is used twice or two images have the same name it avoids a clash. I am considering including say RENAME.BAT which would rename the pictures back to their original file name if copied onto disk first. >Will they retain all EXIF and ITPC data? (ie - a simple file system copy >will not remove this data - any type of jpg re-save might.) Yes, although currently time/date not preserved (this might change!) >Will full archive versions be supported in the PC Slide show as well? Hmmmm, I haven't included a .xats file yet, only the pictures, so I guess not yet. Chris. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Using XATSHOW also as ARCHIVE
Hello >Why not use a self-extracting ZIP file? You can do this with the pro edition. You can add a file called SETUP.EXE which could be a self extracting .exe file. Chris. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Using XATSHOW also as ARCHIVE
Thanks, I didn't remember that. However, I am looking for something that automatically builds and thought that a self-extractor not only overcomes the short filename problem but adds compression. D. _________________________________ Darwin Sanoy Principal Consultant / Instructor DesktopEngineer.com WindowsInstallerTraining.com Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 3:37 PM Hello >Why not use a self-extracting ZIP file? You can do this with the pro edition. You can add a file called SETUP.EXE which could be a self extracting .exe file. Chris. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Using XATSHOW also as ARCHIVE
Just wanted to drop another note on archival copies. I currently name my pictures as such "yyyy-mm-###" and then in the slide show I overlay the file name so that when the pictures are being watched and someone things "I would love to have that one printed!" they can copy down the number. However, if they attempt to find the image in the archive it won't match. So on the reasons for renaming: *) We are limited to 8.3 filenames: If you did a self-extracting zip archive you could overcome the long file name limitation and get compression. *) Renaming preserves the order of the images: I am not sure the preserving the order of the images is that important for archiving for most folks. If order is important then maybe the could also include the PC slide show and extract from it to determine image order. *) If an image is used twice or two images have the same name it avoids a clash: For archiving purposes, just include one copy of the original - it just seems like lots of extra disk space to include more than one. I think perhaps if you do the archive before building the slide show you could easily extract the needed info before doing an internal renaming, etc. Just begging for a much more user friendly archive for the grandparents - and for me since archived images correlate to my real image names. Another reason I am looking for renaming is off-site backup - if the XATSHOW archive is all I have left of my photos, then the simple sequence number naming across all achive CDs would be a huge mess to figure out. Thanks, D. _________________________________ Darwin Sanoy Principal Consultant / Instructor DesktopEngineer.com WindowsInstallerTraining.com Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 2:06 AM Hello Darwin >I hate to whine before the feature is even out Its ok, I'm used to it ;-) .... and of course its the best time to as It could be changed! >- but I have my files >named uniquely so that they can always be indentified no matter where >they are located (YYYY-MM-000). > >Why do they need to be renamed? Three reasons: We are limited to 8.3 filenames Renaming preserves the order of the images If an image is used twice or two images have the same name it avoids a clash. I am considering including say RENAME.BAT which would rename the pictures back to their original file name if copied onto disk first. >Will they retain all EXIF and ITPC data? (ie - a simple file system copy >will not remove this data - any type of jpg re-save might.) Yes, although currently time/date not preserved (this might change!) >Will full archive versions be supported in the PC Slide show as well? Hmmmm, I haven't included a .xats file yet, only the pictures, so I guess not yet. Chris. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|